miscon:math.fractions.part-to-part · draft · trust low · v0.1.1 · kind notation-confusion
Writing the shaded part over the unshaded part
A fraction compares the shaded part with the unshaded part, so the number of shaded pieces goes on top and the number of unshaded pieces goes underneath.
- Stable URI
- https://open-misconceptions.github.io/miscon-data/m/math.fractions.part-to-part
- UUID
15a57c88-bbde-47b3-bd0d-6771a62e6cec- Domain
math.fractions- Level band
- early-primary, primary
- Locale
- en
- About
- CCSS 3.NF.A.1
http://corestandards.org/Math/Content/3/NF/A/1/
Evidence patterns
Pattern 0: name the fraction shaded in a shape divided into equal parts
writes shaded/unshaded instead of shaded/total
A bar is cut into 5 equal parts and 3 are shaded. What fraction is shaded?3/53/2Discriminators
vs a slip. Consistent across items, and the learner produces 'fractions' larger than one for a majority-shaded shape without noticing. A slip is one miswritten denominator.
vs math.fractions.unequal-parts. Unequal-parts believers write the correct denominator (the total count) on equal-parts shapes; part-to-part writers do not.
Relations
conflicts_with- CCSS 3.NF.A.1: understand a fraction 1/b as one part of a whole partitioned into b equal parts
http://corestandards.org/Math/Content/3/NF/A/1/ resolved_by- CCSS 3.NF.A.1: understand a fraction 1/b as one part of a whole partitioned into b equal parts
http://corestandards.org/Math/Content/3/NF/A/1/ confusable_withmath.fractions.unequal-parts
Alignments
- CCSS 3.NF.A.1
http://corestandards.org/Math/Content/3/NF/A/1/(about)
Provenance
Origin: llm-drafted
- Hart, K. M. (Ed.). (1981). Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11-16. John Murray. (Concepts in Secondary Mathematics and Science project.)
CSMS fractions items: part-part responses on shaded-region tasks. - Kerslake, D. (1986). Fractions: Children's Strategies and Errors. NFER-Nelson.
- Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding: Essential Content Knowledge and Instructional Strategies for Teachers (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Distinguishes part-whole from ratio (part-part) interpretations.
Drafted from the cited literature for the Open Misconceptions seed pack; statement, examples and discriminators are original text. Awaiting maintainer review.
Review status
Status draft, trust low (computed from the reviews below against the reviewer registry).
No reviews yet.
Formats
- Raw JSON
- CASE 1.1 package (CFItem
15a57c88-bbde-47b3-bd0d-6771a62e6cec) - Source on GitHub
Cite
miscon:math.fractions.part-to-part
https://open-misconceptions.github.io/miscon-data/m/math.fractions.part-to-part